Wedding for $1,000 Plan small. Mean it.

Free tools

Guest list guide

How many people you invite shapes most of your budget. Here's how to settle on a number without cutting anyone out of your life.

What ten more guests actually cost

Guest count quietly drives four lines of your budget at once. Venue is mostly a flat cost and photography is priced by the hour, but food, rentals, stationery, and dessert all go up with every person you add.

What scales with every guest
CategoryCost per 10 guestsWhy
Food$80-120Even a simple taco bar or brunch spread runs $8-12 a head done well.
Rentals & seating$20-35Chairs, a table, linens, plates, and cups for ten more people.
Dessert$12-20A bigger sheet cake, or ten more servings from the bakery.
Stationery$8-15Printed invitations, stamps, place cards, a program.
Every 10 guests adds$120-180So thirty guests instead of sixty saves you $360 to $540.
Another way to look at it A short guest list lets you be more generous with everyone on it. At a $1,000 wedding, thirty guests get about $33 each. Ninety guests get $11. That's a good meal versus a cracker tray.

The three questions

Ask all three about every name, in the same order. If you use the same rule for everyone, it's easy to stand behind. Use it for your cousin but not your coworker and you've got an argument on your hands.

Question 1

Would the day be different if they weren't there?

Some people you'd miss the moment you looked around the room. Others you'd only notice were missing later, flipping through photos. The first group is tier 1, and it's usually a shorter list than you'd think.

If the answer is no. That doesn't mean they're out of your life. They just aren't in this room.

Question 2

Have we spoken in the past year, without a funeral or an algorithm arranging it?

A wedding is a strange place to pick a friendship back up. If your last real conversation was a birthday comment on social media, call them first. Then decide.

If the answer is no. If you miss them, reach out on your own. That means more than a seat at the wedding.

Question 3

Are we inviting a person, or an obligation?

Obligations can sound a lot like reasons. They came to your sibling's wedding. Your mom works with them. You'd feel bad. None of that is about the person, and each one still costs $12 to $18 a head.

If the answer is no. Say the obligation out loud. It gets a lot easier to skip once you've named it.

Build the list in three tiers

Write every name down once, then pick a tier for it, and keep an eye on the running count. We've already added the two of you, since at this size it's surprisingly easy to forget to feed yourselves.

Tier
$
Tier 1 only
2
Tiers 1 and 2
2
Per head, tiers 1 and 2
$175.00

Tier 1Must invite 0

The people whose absence would change the day.

    Tier 2Would be nice 0

    Invite from here only if tier 1 leaves room in the food budget.

      Tier 3Not this time 0

      This one's about the budget, not about them. Celebrate with them another way.

        Your list disappears when you close this page, so copy or print it before you go.

        Scripts for the three hard conversations

        Say the number, explain the rule, and offer something specific instead. People can handle a no. What stings is being left to guess.

        When a parent wants to add namesUse with: whoever is contributing money, or thinks they are.
        We've capped the guest list at [number], because with [total] that's how many people we can actually feed well. Every ten people we add costs about $150, and that comes out of the food. If there's someone you really want there, tell me who, and I'll tell you what we'd have to cut. I'd rather we figure it out together than have it sneak up on us.

        Why it works. You're not saying no. You're showing them the math and letting them weigh the tradeoff. Most people drop the request right there, and the ones who don't usually offer to chip in.

        When someone asks whether they're invitedUse with: the friend, cousin, or coworker who asks directly.
        I'm really glad you asked, so I'll be straight with you. We're keeping it tiny, about [number] people, and we had to stop at [immediate family and a few people we see every week]. You're not on the list, and I promise it's not about you. Can I take you out afterward instead? I'd much rather have two hours with you than twenty minutes across a room.

        Why it works. You answer the question, explain the rule so it doesn't feel personal, and offer something real in its place. It's the vague "we'll catch up soon" that hurts feelings.

        When you have to say no to plus-onesUse in the invitation itself, or in the reply to the ask.
        The room only holds [number], so we can only seat the names on the envelope. If you're seeing someone serious, tell me and I'll find a chair. If it's a first or second date, this probably isn't the wedding for it, and honestly you'll have more fun without all the introductions.

        Why it works. It's about the size of the room, not about who you like. And it leaves space for serious partners, which is the only plus-one argument worth having.

        Every one of these is also a fill-in-by-hand page in the free $1,000 Wedding Starter Kit, if you'd rather print it out and write on it.